Cited by 103Malaria Research and ControlMosquito-borne diseases and controlDiptera species taxonomy and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Larval Development of the Molecular Forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Different Habitats: A Transplantation Experiment

Open access
Diabaté, Abdoulaye, Dabire, Roch K., Kim, Eun H., Dalton, Ryan, Millogo, Niama, Baldet, Thierry, Simard, Frederic, Gimnig, John E., Hawley, William A., Lehmann, Tovi·2005·Journal of Medical Entomology

Abstract

We compared the development of the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s. in different larval habitats. First stage larvae (L1s) of wild-caught females were placed into cages in natural habitats of the M form (rice fields) or the S form (puddles/ quarries). Each cage was covered with cloth, allowing exchange of water, solutes, and small particles, including microorganisms, and was seeded with 100 L1s of a single form (M or S) or by a mixture of 50:50 of M and S forms. Emergence success of both forms in puddles and quarries was three-fold higher than in the rice fields. The emergence rate of the S form was higher than that of the M form in both habitats, but the form x habitat interaction was not significant. In temporary larval sites such as puddles, emergence success of the M form was lower in mixed cages than in single form cages, whereas the reverse was true for the S form, suggesting competition between the forms. The median developmental time was not significantly different between forms. Although these findings demonstrate differences between forms, they do not suggest that their spatial segregation is determined by differences in their exploitation of the physical and chemical conditions in these environments. These results should be regarded with caution because small numbers of first stage larvae could pass through the cloth of the cages.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0548:ldotmf]2.0.co;2

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Diabaté, A., Dabire, R. K., Kim, E. H., Dalton, R., Millogo, N., Baldet, T., Simard, F., Gimnig, J. E., Hawley, W. A., & Lehmann, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre Muraz (BF)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Medical Entomology
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
548-553
ISSN
0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4236158617
Cited by
103
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
Keywords
Anopheles gambiae, molecular forms, M-form, S-form, larval development, larval habitat, paddy fields, puddles, quarries, emergence success, larval competition, spatial segregation, transplant experiment
MeSH terms
Animals, Anopheles, Environment, Female, Larva

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review